Syria

OKAY

The U.S. undoubtedly feels that the Al-Assad regime in Syria has used chemical weapons to kill thousands of men, women, and children.

The U.S. is now debating whether to attack Syria and stop these atrocities. Using chemical weapons like this is against international protocol.

What do you guys think about this?

 

The chemicals were actually used by the Muslims, in order to "provoke" NATO, and thus give them a reason to invade Syria. Whatever they decide to do, however, Russia, China and a bunch of other strong countries won't let invade, because they have military bases there, and NATO gaining control over the country would mean a heavy loss for them. Russia has already sent out an armada to the Mediterranean from the Black Sea, to sent out a warning to NATO. Also, the news just "forget" to mention the horrible stuff the Muslim opposition does in general. They kill countless of Christian Orthodox people in brutal ways ( beheading, pushing them of buildings ) they torture enemy soldiers they capture and have even killed two small KIDS for supporting Assad. They are terrorists and I hope they are stopped before it's too late.

Damn the Americans and their stupid "democracy"

Needless to say I support Al-Assad.

Gotchee wrote:The chemicals were actually used by the Muslims, in order to "provoke" NATO, and thus give them a reason to invade Syria. Whatever they decide to do, however, Russia, China and a bunch of other strong countries won't let invade, because they have military bases there, and NATO gaining control over the country would mean a heavy loss for them. Russia has already sent out an armada to the Mediterranean from the Black Sea, to sent out a warning to NATO. Also, the news just "forget" to mention the horrible stuff the Muslim opposition does in general. They kill countless of Christian Orthodox people in brutal ways ( beheading, pushing them of buildings ) they torture enemy soldiers they capture and have even killed two small KIDS for supporting Assad. They are terrorists and I hope they are stopped before it's too late.

Damn the Americans and their stupid "democracy"

Needless to say I support Al-Assad.

First off, Al-Assad is A musilm. So your argument invalid there. It's not Muslims vs Christians. It's rebels vs Al Assad.

Next: The chemicals were used by Al Assad.

SKIPS OVER POLITICS

Why "damn america and their stupid democracy"? Greece has a democracy too, you know.. And a constitutional monarchy like Britain is basically a democracy too.


SO

Yeah

King Kane wrote:

Gotchee wrote:The chemicals were actually used by the Muslims, in order to "provoke" NATO, and thus give them a reason to invade Syria. Whatever they decide to do, however, Russia, China and a bunch of other strong countries won't let invade, because they have military bases there, and NATO gaining control over the country would mean a heavy loss for them. Russia has already sent out an armada to the Mediterranean from the Black Sea, to sent out a warning to NATO. Also, the news just "forget" to mention the horrible stuff the Muslim opposition does in general. They kill countless of Christian Orthodox people in brutal ways ( beheading, pushing them of buildings ) they torture enemy soldiers they capture and have even killed two small KIDS for supporting Assad. They are terrorists and I hope they are stopped before it's too late.

Damn the Americans and their stupid "democracy"

Needless to say I support Al-Assad.

First off, Al-Assad is A musilm. So your argument invalid there. It's not Muslims vs Christians. It's rebels vs Al Assad.

Next: The chemicals were used by Al Assad.

SKIPS OVER POLITICS

Why "damn america and their stupid democracy"? Greece has a democracy too, you know.. And a constitutional monarchy like Britain is basically a democracy too.


SO

Yeah

 
1) Might be a Muslim, not all of them are bad after all. Some actually try to protect Christians. The problem are the Muslim extremists. And the rebels are entirely made of Muslim extremists, both from Syria and a bunch of other countries they recruited from, like Lebanon and Egypt. That's also why Assad was thinking of attacking Lebanon.
2)The chemicals were not used by him, please do me a favor and stop believing everything your government tells you so easily. Even without actual evidence ( that does exist ), Assad wouldn't be so stupid throwing CHEMICALS when he knows that NATO is flying over his country like a vulture ready to attack, and the UN are present in his country anyway. It would give them the perfect chance to attack. 
3) When I say "damn Americans and their stupid democracy" I mean damn the American government and their ways of "bringing" democracy to other countries.

Thank you.

P.S

Could we just forget about this whole argument

Gotchee wrote:

King Kane wrote:

Gotchee wrote:The chemicals were actually used by the Muslims, in order to "provoke" NATO, and thus give them a reason to invade Syria. Whatever they decide to do, however, Russia, China and a bunch of other strong countries won't let invade, because they have military bases there, and NATO gaining control over the country would mean a heavy loss for them. Russia has already sent out an armada to the Mediterranean from the Black Sea, to sent out a warning to NATO. Also, the news just "forget" to mention the horrible stuff the Muslim opposition does in general. They kill countless of Christian Orthodox people in brutal ways ( beheading, pushing them of buildings ) they torture enemy soldiers they capture and have even killed two small KIDS for supporting Assad. They are terrorists and I hope they are stopped before it's too late.

Damn the Americans and their stupid "democracy"

Needless to say I support Al-Assad.

First off, Al-Assad is A musilm. So your argument invalid there. It's not Muslims vs Christians. It's rebels vs Al Assad.

Next: The chemicals were used by Al Assad.

SKIPS OVER POLITICS

Why "damn america and their stupid democracy"? Greece has a democracy too, you know.. And a constitutional monarchy like Britain is basically a democracy too.


SO

Yeah

 
1) Might be a Muslim, not all of them are bad after all. Some actually try to protect Christians. The problem are the Muslim extremists.
2)The chemicals were not used by him, please do me a favor and stop believing everything your government tells you so easily. Even without actual evidence ( that does exist ), Assad wouldn't be so stupid throwing CHEMICALS when he knows that NATO is flying over his country like a vulture ready to attack, and the UN are present in his country anyway. It would give them the perfect chance to attack. 
3) When I say "damn Americans and their stupid democracy" I mean damn the American government and their ways of "bringing" democracy to other countries.

Thank you.

P.S

Could we just forget about this whole argument

Okay
Anyway, let's see what decision the US takes.

Will the US HAVE ANOTHER WAR :0

The House of Commons has voted to reject British involvement in Syria - it's too expensive, for one thing.

Syria is a very hot issue, so I won't say much about it. I hope the international community does the right thing, that's all.

I have no further comments on the issue.